ugly_split_ends: (What did Romeo see in Juliet?)
Fukawa Touko (腐川冬子) / Genocider Shou (ジェノサイダー翔) ([personal profile] ugly_split_ends) wrote in [community profile] thefoundation 2020-08-28 03:20 am (UTC)

... [She's curious, but decides it can wait.]

No, that was never an option. Nishigawa's the villain... furthermore, he wanted her to find out, exactly so he could proposition her in the exact way he did. Make her vulnerable and exploit it. So there'd be no tension because he'd be thinking of it the moment they met. Maybe he didn't know exactly that Sora would be around to tell her exactly what had happened, but he was prepared for her to come back again a second time about it. If Sora hadn't been there to support her... well, the storyline gets dark if you think too far down that road.

Technically, it was accurate information. The article wasn't fake. I was also trying to comment on the nature of "hidden" sides to issues reported as matter-of-fact. Even when they seem so obviously right or wrong. Of course, it ties into Sora's assumptions and how Nishigawa uses his position to do what he wants.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting